Vendor Platform Analysis

Twist vs Agilent for Oligo Pool Synthesis

A practical comparison of two oligo pool synthesis platforms. Compare Twist's silicon chip technology with Agilent's SurePrint platform across synthesis quality, length limits, turnaround time, pool capacity, application suitability, and vendor-file prep.

How to use this comparison

This page compares Twist Bioscience and Agilent SurePrint for oligo pool synthesis. For a broader supplier shortlist, review the vendor comparison and public specification table alongside your quote requirements.

Quick Summary

VendorBest fit
Twist BioscienceLonger pooled oligos, CRISPR screens, variant libraries, rapid iteration, and projects where sub-pools or strong uniformity are central ordering requirements.
Agilent SurePrintNGS target-enrichment panels, SureSelect-oriented capture designs, very large probe sets, and teams already standardized on Agilent design and ordering systems.

Comprehensive Comparison

FeatureTwist BioscienceAgilent SurePrint
Synthesis TechnologySilicon-based chipInkjet printing on glass slides
Max Oligo Length300 nt (standard pools)230 nt
Min Pool Size~2,000 sequences~5,000–10,000 sequences
Max Pool SizeNo stated limitUp to 244K per chip
Per-Base Error Rate~1:3,000~1:500–1:1,500 (HiFi: 1:4,000)
Uniformity (90/10)<3-fold~5-fold
Turnaround Time2–4 business days3–6 business days
Delivery FormatLyophilized in tubeLyophilized
Yield per Oligo1–10 pmol~10 fmol
Sub-Pool SupportUp to 100 sub-poolsNot standard
ModificationsBiotin, phosphorylationBiotin
Order File FormatName, Sequence, Length (CSV)Vendor-specific CSV

Agilent HiFi changes the accuracy comparison

Agilent offers a "HiFi" option with error rates as low as 1:4,000 — potentially matching or exceeding Twist's standard accuracy. However, HiFi comes at a premium cost and may have longer turnaround times. Contact Agilent for HiFi-specific pricing and availability.

Error Impact by Oligo Length

The practical impact of per-base error rates depends heavily on your oligo length. Longer oligos accumulate more errors:

Oligo LengthTwist (1:3,000)Agilent (1:500–1:4,000)
20 nt (sgRNA)99.3% perfect96.1–98.0% perfect
100 nt (probe)96.7% perfect81.9–93.2% perfect
200 nt (assembly)93.6% perfect67.0–87.1% perfect

Use our Error Rate Calculator to model these scenarios with your exact oligo length and coupling efficiency.

Application-Specific Recommendations

CRISPR Library Screening

Common fit: Twist Bioscience. Strong uniformity (<3-fold 90/10) supports even representation of guide sequences. The 2–4 day turnaround, sub-pool support, and 300 nt maximum length fit common sgRNA library architectures.

NGS Target Enrichment Panels

Common fit: Agilent SurePrint. Agilent's SureSelect system is widely used for target enrichment, and its probe design software integrates tightly with SurePrint synthesis. Up to 244K probes per chip supports large clinical panels, while the HiFi option provides an additional accuracy tier.

Gene Assembly (Synthetic Biology)

Common fit: Twist Bioscience. The 300 nt maximum length allows longer assembly fragments, reducing the number of overlapping oligos needed per gene. The stronger standard accuracy profile may also reduce error-correction burden.

Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS)

Common fit: Twist Bioscience. Stronger uniformity supports more even representation of variants. Sub-pool capability can also support dose-response or condition-specific variant sets within a single order.

Sequence file preparation

Before requesting quotes or placing an order, validate the sequence set and prepare the vendor-specific upload file. Use the Vendor Format Adapter for Twist and Agilent file formatting, and review the sequence set with Batch Sequence QC before submission.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Agilent SureSelect probes with Twist oligo pools?

Yes. You can design enrichment panels with Agilent's SureDesign software and synthesize the probe sequences with either vendor. If you use Twist-synthesized probes in an Agilent-oriented capture protocol, validate hybridization with pilot experiments because Agilent's proprietary capture system is optimized for SurePrint-synthesized probes.

Which vendor has lower per-oligo pricing?

Neither vendor publishes fixed per-oligo pricing. Both quote based on pool size, oligo length, and order volume. Per-oligo cost generally decreases at larger pool sizes, so you need direct quotes from both vendors for a meaningful comparison.

What about Agilent&apos;s HiFi vs Twist&apos;s standard error rate?

Agilent's HiFi option can match or exceed Twist's standard accuracy on paper, but it is a premium service with different availability and pricing. For standard SurePrint runs, Twist still offers the more consistently stronger accuracy profile.